Log in Get started free

AI Detector for Publishers

Editorial teams do not need a verdict on a submission. They need to know which paragraphs will read as filler to a reader, and they need it before the piece goes live.

In short: A publisher's workflow runs on sentences: an editor fixes the line that lost the thread, not the document. DeAIze scores a draft, highlights every sentence by AI probability, rewrites the flagged ones, keeps a rewrite only when semantic similarity says the meaning survived, and re-scores so the change is visible. Detector output is a probability estimate — a style signal for an editor, not proof of who wrote the draft.

Screening that produces a to-do list

A per-sentence breakdown turns "this reads generic" into four specific lines an editor can fix in ten minutes.

Voice survives the pass

Unflagged sentences are left alone, so the rewrite does not sand down the parts that were already good.

Files stay in the workflow

.docx, .pdf and .txt uploads come back with Word formatting preserved: headings, styles and tables.

Confidential by default

Text is processed per task only, never used for training and never resold — the answer an NDA needs.

StageWhat you runWhat you do with the output
Submission triageA full-document detection passSort drafts into clean, needs-a-look, and needs-a-rewrite
Line editThe same pass, read sentence by sentenceFix the specific lines flagged for uniform rhythm or filler phrasing
Pre-publish checkA re-score after the editConfirm the text changed enough to be worth the edit
Freelance sign-offDetection on the delivered fileAsk for a revision on named sentences instead of rejecting the whole piece

A document score is the wrong unit for editing

An editor never rewrites a document. They rewrite the paragraph that repeated itself, the paragraph that promised a section and delivered a summary, the three sentences in a row that all start with "Additionally". Editing is a local operation, and a single document-level number cannot tell you where to put your hands.

Sentence-level highlighting can. When the flat lines are marked, a two-hour revision turns into a twenty-minute pass, and — just as important — the editor can stop. They can see that the piece is clean from the third section on, and leave it alone.

Screening submissions without accusing anyone

Detection belongs at the desk, not in the correspondence. A score is a probability estimate about prose texture: it says the writing is unusually uniform, not that a named person did or did not write it. Freelancers know this, and a rejection email that leads with a percentage reads as a verdict even when nobody meant it that way.

The practical approach is to quote sentences, not scores. "These four lines read as generic; here is why" is a note a writer can act on and argue with. "Our detector did not like this" is not, and it invites a fight about the tool rather than the copy.

The edit loop: score, rewrite, re-score

DeAIze runs detection first and highlights every sentence by AI probability. The editor rewrites the flagged sentences — or runs the humanizer on them — and the document is scored again, so the improvement is a pair of numbers rather than an impression.

Each rewrite passes a semantic similarity check before it is kept. That gate matters more in publishing than anywhere else, because a rewrite that quietly changes a claim about a product, a price or a medical effect is a correction waiting to happen. If the meaning moves, the rewrite is discarded.

House style and the file itself

A finished draft arrives as a .docx with a house font, subheads, a byline block and a specs table. Rebuilding that file after a rewrite is the kind of hidden cost that makes a tool not worth using, so DeAIze accepts .docx, .pdf and .txt and returns the rewritten document with Word formatting preserved.

Confidentiality is the other half of the same question. Text is processed per task only — never used for training, never resold — which is what makes the tool usable on an embargoed launch or a client's unpublished manuscript.

Paying for the volume you actually use

Editorial volume is spiky. A quiet month does not need a subscription, and a launch week should not run out of quota. DeAIze is pay-as-you-go: 200 free words on signup with no card, then Starter at $20.99 for 1,000 words, Standard $44.99 for 3,000, Pro $99.99 for 10,000 and Max $199.99 for 30,000.

Credits never expire, so a pack bought for one campaign is still there for the next one. Where third-party detector APIs are configured, DeAIze also cross-checks a draft against them, which is how an editor finds out early that two detectors disagree about the same text.

Give the desk a to-do list, not a verdict.

200 free words on signup, no card. Run a draft through the detector and see which sentences need the edit.

Get started free

Related guides

All guides →

Frequently Asked Questions

Can we tell a freelancer their draft was flagged as AI?

You can, but quote the sentences rather than the score. Detection output is a probability estimate about writing style and cannot establish who wrote a piece, so a score reads as an accusation when it is only a signal.

Does DeAIze replace a plagiarism check?

No. It detects AI-leaning sentences and rewrites them. Source matching is a separate job and needs a separate tool.

Is client copy safe to upload?

Text is processed per task only. It is not used for training and is never resold. If a contract has specific data-residency requirements, check those against your own policy before uploading.

What does it cost for a small editorial team?

There is no per-seat subscription. You buy words: Starter $20.99 for 1,000, Standard $44.99 for 3,000, Pro $99.99 for 10,000, Max $199.99 for 30,000. New accounts get 200 free words, and credits never expire.