DeAIze Team

The DeAIze guides are written and maintained by the team that builds the detector. Every article is produced by someone who has run the workflow in the DeAIze workbench on real text — drafts, abstracts, reports, marketing copy — rather than summarised from other blog posts.

How an article is produced

We pick a question readers actually ask about a named detector (GPTZero, Turnitin, Copyleaks, Originality.ai, Sapling).
We test the behaviour in the product, and where a detector API is configured we record the before/after scores as a cross-check.
We write the answer first, then the reasoning, and cite the detector documentation we relied on.
Guides are revisited when a detector changes or when reader feedback shows a claim no longer holds — each article carries a visible "last updated" date.

Disclosure: we use AI tools too

We build a humanizer, so it would be dishonest to pretend our own drafting process is untouched by AI. Drafts may be AI-assisted; the testing, the judgments, the numbers and the responsibility for what is published are ours. Every factual claim about a detector in our guides is one we have checked, and every metric we publish is dated with its sample basis described on the methodology page.

Corrections policy

If something here is wrong — a detector behaviour, a number, a claim about how a tool works — email [email protected] and we will correct the article and update its modified date. Corrections are applied to the article, not buried in a new post.

DeAIze Team

How an article is produced

Disclosure: we use AI tools too

Corrections policy

Recent articles