WriteHuman Alternative: Sentence-Level Edits You Can Actually Check

If you are looking for a WriteHuman alternative, the question worth answering first is not which tool rewrites text — most do — but whether you can see and check what it changed. DeAIze answers that by starting from the sentence: it shows which sentences read machine-made, rewrites only those, and gives you the result to accept, reject or edit one by one.

In short

DeAIze is a sentence-level editor, not a percentage with a rewrite button attached. Paste or upload a draft and one view gives you the sentences that read machine-made, a rewrite for each, and a re-check of what you accepted. Detection at the sentence level is free without an account, 200 words of rewriting are free after you confirm your email, there is no subscription, and credits never expire. Your .docx comes back with its headings, fonts and tables where you left them.

What DeAIze does differently

The flagged sentences are the interface. A document score tells you something is wrong and nothing about where. The sentences are the part you can act on — and rewriting sentences that were never flagged only adds risk without lowering anything.

You check the rewrite, not just receive it. Every suggestion sits next to the sentence it replaces, so you accept or reject it in place instead of rebuilding your document by hand from a new block of text. A suggestion that shifts what you actually said is discarded rather than offered.

Your document stays your document. .docx, .pdf and .txt in, .docx out, with structure preserved. Formatting is where tools in this category quietly fail — a rewrite that costs you your headings and tables is not a saving.

Pay for what you use, whenever you use it. No subscription to forget about. Credits do not expire, so a pack bought for one deadline is still there for the next one.

What to ask about any tool in this category

Details of every product here change without notice, so rather than repeat a rival’s marketing back at you, these are the questions that separate one from another — with our own answers in the last column.

What to ask	Why it matters	DeAIze
Does it show which sentences were flagged?	Without the list you cannot tell a real edit from a paraphrase, and you cannot verify anything	Yes — the flagged sentences are the interface
Can you accept or reject edits one by one?	A whole-document rewrite hides every decision it made	Yes, per sentence, in place
Does it re-check what you accepted?	A rewrite is a guess until it is measured again	Yes, the result is re-scored
Can you upload a real file, tables and all?	Most tools return plain text and leave you to rebuild the document	.docx, .pdf, .txt in; Word formatting preserved
What does it cost after the free tier?	Subscriptions bill you for months you did not write anything	Pay-as-you-go credits that never expire; no subscription
What does the vendor promise about scores?	“Undetectable” claims cannot be verified — detector models change without notice	Nothing about scores. We publish what our own tests found

What our own measurements found

We publish our own numbers, including the unflattering ones. On 2026-09-13 we scored 23 hand-written DeAIze guides: at a 30% threshold, 5 were flagged, with scores from 0% to 46%. Every one of those documents was written by a person, from notes, without AI assistance.

That is the most useful thing we can tell you about detection, because it explains why a number alone is a poor place to stop. Text can be statistically predictable while being entirely human; nothing in a score records who typed it. What you can act on is the sentence — which is why the flagged list, and not the percentage, is the part worth choosing a tool for.

What to check before you pick

1. Paste something you wrote before AI existed. If it gets flagged, you have just learned how much a score is worth — and how much you need the sentence-level view.
2. Ask for the sentence list, not the number. A tool that only returns a rewritten block is asking you to trust an edit you cannot inspect.
3. Read the rewrite against your original. If a claim got softer or vaguer, the tool paraphrased rather than rewrote.
4. Upload a file with a table in it. Formatting failures are the ones you notice after you have already paid.
5. Read what the vendor promises. A percentage nobody can verify is not a feature.

What we do not promise

• A specific score. Detectors disagree with one another on the same text and their models change; a pass today is not a pass next month.
• A verdict on authorship. No detector, ours included, can tell you who typed a sentence.
• Permission your institution has not given. If your course or employer forbids AI assistance, rewriting is not the answer — check the rule first. We keep that on what we promise — and what we don’t rather than in a footnote.

If all you need is a different block of text, plenty of tools will produce one. If you need to see what changed and keep your own meaning and formatting, start with our draft editor on the free words and judge the suggestions it makes.